How Water Dissolves Stone, Molecule by Molecule
Dec. 5, 2013 — Scientists from Rice University and the University of
Bremen's Center for Marine Environmental Sciences (MARUM) in Germany have
combined cutting-edge experimental techniques and computer simulations to find
a new way of predicting how water dissolves crystalline structures like those
found in natural stone and cement.
In a new study featured on the cover of the Nov. 28 issue of the Journal
of Physical Chemistry C, the team found their method was more
efficient at predicting the dissolution rates of crystalline structures in
water than previous methods. The research could have wide-ranging impacts in
diverse areas, including water quality and planning, environmental
sustainability, corrosion resistance and cement construction.
The dissolution process of a crystalline structure in
water is shown: two bonded SiO4 -- molecules dissolve (top left),
a quartz crystal (top right) and the computer-simulated surface
of a dissolving crystalline structure (below).
(Credit: MARUM & Rice University).
"We need to gain a better understanding of dissolution
mechanisms to better predict the fate of certain materials, both in nature and
in man-made systems," said lead investigator Andreas Lüttge, a professor
of mineralogy at MARUM and professor emeritus and research professor in Earth
science at Rice. His team specializes in studying the thin boundary layer that
forms between minerals and fluids.
Boundary layers are ubiquitous in nature; they occur when
raindrops fall on stone, water seeps through soil and the ocean meets the sea
floor. Scientists and engineers have long been interested in accurately
explaining how crystalline materials, including many minerals and stones,
interact with and are dissolved by water. Calculations about the rate of these
dissolution processes are critical in many fields of science and engineering.
In the new study, Lüttge and lead author Inna Kurganskaya, a
research associate in Earth science at Rice, studied dissolution processes
using quartz, one of the most common minerals found in nature. Quartz, or
silicon dioxide, is a type of silicate, the most abundant group of minerals in
Earth's crust.
At the boundary layer where quartz and water meet, multiple
chemical reactions occur. Some of these happen simultaneously and others take place
in succession. In the new study, the researchers sought to create a
computerized model that could accurately simulate the complex chemistry at the
boundary layer.
"The new model simulates the dissolution kinetics at the
boundary layer with greater precision than earlier stochastic models operating
at the same scale," Kurganskaya said. "Existing simulations rely on
rate constants assigned to a wide range of possible reactions, and as a result,
the total material flux from the surface have an inherent variance range -- a
plus or minus factor that is always there."
One reason the team's simulations more accurately represent real
processes is that its models incorporate actual measurements from cutting-edge
instruments and from high-tech materials, including glass ceramics and
nanomaterials. With a special imaging technique called "vertical scanning
interferometry," which the group at MARUM and Rice helped to develop, the
team scanned the crystal surfaces of both minerals and manufactured materials
to generate topographic maps with a resolution of a just a few nanometers, or
billionths of a meter.
"We found that dissolution rates that were predicted using
rate constants were sometimes off by as much as two orders of magnitude,"
Lüttge said.
The new method for more precisely predicting dissolution processes
could revolutionize the way engineers and scientists make many calculations
related to a myriad of things, including the stability of building materials,
the longevity of materials used for radioactive waste storage and more, he
said.
"Further work is needed to prove the broad utility of the
method," he said. "In the next phase of research, we plan to test our
simulations on larger systems and over longer periods."
The research was supported by the Global Climate and Energy
Project at Stanford University.
No comments